Willis Tower 233 S. Wacker, Suite 6100 Chicago, Illinois 60606-6359
Phone: 312.443.3200 | Fax: 312.630.8500 | E-mail: wmjinfo@willmont.com
C. Barry Montgomery - Partner
Biography
C. Barry Montgomery is a founding partner of the 40-lawyer commercial litigation firm of Williams Montgomery & John Ltd. Mr. Montgomery, together with Peter John, is co-chair of the firm's commercial litigation practice. He also is a member of the firm's product liability and professional liability practice groups. Mr. Montgomery focuses his practice on complex commercial litigation, product liability, class actions and construction litigation, as well as directors' and officers' liability and professional liability litigation. He is a Fellow of the International Academy of Trial Lawyers, a Fellow of the International Society of Barristers and a Fellow of the Litigation Counsel of America. He is "AV Preeminent" peer review rated by Martindale-Hubbell, reflecting the highest peer recognition for ethical standards and legal ability.
Mr. Montgomery has been recognized by his fellow lawyers and numerous publications as one of the outstanding trial lawyers in the United States. He has been recognized by The National Law Journal as one of the "Top 10 Litigators in the United States," and recently was selected by Leading Lawyers Network as one of the "Top 10 Leading Business Litigators in Illinois." Each year since 1989, Mr. Montgomery has been recognized by Best Lawyers in America and currently is listed in this publication for bet-the-company litigation, commercial litigation, personal injury litigation and medical malpractice law. Leading Lawyers Network has named Mr. Montgomery one of the leading lawyers in Illinois for the defense of product liability actions as well as one of the "Top Ten Commercial Litigation Lawyers in Illinois." Since 2002, Mr. Montgomery has been recognized in the International Who's Who of Product Liability Defense Lawyers.
Mr. Montgomery is an active trial lawyer who has tried more than 150 jury trials to verdict in state and federal courts throughout the United States.
In the commercial litigation area, Mr. Montgomery's significant representations include the successful defense of a major hedge fund firm in a lawsuit for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud. In another case, he successfully represented a director and a member of the audit committee in a multimillion-dollar breach of fiduciary duty lawsuit by a trustee in bankruptcy involving a major publicly traded company. Mr. Montgomery's representation of a national construction company in a multimillion-dollar lawsuit for breach of contract and delay damages resulted in his selection by The National Law Journal as one of the "Top 10 Litigators in the United States."
Mr. Montgomery's significant representations in the product liability area include serving as national trial counsel for Fisher-Price (US) Inc. defending its child restraint car seat litigation. He currently serves as regional trial counsel for Black & Decker and as regional trial counsel for Bausch & Lomb, Inc., the world's leading optical manufacturer. Mr. Montgomery also has served as regional trial counsel for Genentech, Inc., defending the company in a series of pharmaceutical cases, and he was national trial counsel for Muskin Pools and Sears with respect to product liability claims involving above-ground swimming pools.
Several of Mr. Montgomery's product liability verdicts have been recognized by The National Law Journal as "Outstanding Defense Verdicts" in the United States, including the successful defense of Black & Decker (US) Inc. in a product liability lawsuit for compensatory and punitive damages arising out of the alleged defective design of a power saw, and for his successful representation of Bill Kelley Athletic, Inc. (formerly McGregor Sports) in a product liability lawsuit alleging the defective design of a football helmet worn by an 18-year-old plaintiff who became a quadriplegic when making a tackle.
Education/Bar Admissions
Mr. Montgomery received a B.A., cum laude, in 1959 from Muskingum University and received his J.D. in 1962 from the University of Michigan Law School, where he was a Lecki Scholar. He received a DPS in 2005 from Muskingum University.
Mr. Montgomery has served as a faculty instructor at the University of Michigan, Advocacy Institute, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1985; National Institute for Trial Advocacy, Advanced Program, Boulder, Colo., 1986; International Association of Defense Counsel Trial Academy, Boulder, Colo., 1987; and Illinois State Bar Association, Trial Techniques Institute, Chicago, Ill., 1999.
Mr. Montgomery was admitted to the Illinois bar in 1962 and also has been admitted in the following federal and state trial and appellate courts:
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois (including the trial bar)
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
- United States Supreme Court
In addition, he has been admitted pro hac vice in numerous jurisdictions, including Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Menomonee Trial Court, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, U.S. Virgin Islands, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.
Professional Activities/Recognition
Mr. Montgomery is a Fellow of the International Academy of Trial Lawyers, a Fellow of the International Society of Barristers and a Fellow of the Litigation Counsel of America. He is a member of numerous professional organizations, including:
- Chicago Bar Association
- Illinois State Bar Association
- American Bar Association
- Seventh Circuit Bar Association
- Legal Club of Chicago
- The Society of Trial Lawyers
- Trial Lawyers Club of Chicago
- Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel
- Illinois Association of Health Care Attorneys
- Trucking Industry Defense Association
- Defense Research Institute
- Best Lawyers in America, 1989-2011: currently listed for bet-the-company litigation, commercial litigation, personal injury litigation and medical malpractice law.
- "Top 10 Litigators in the United States," The National Law Journal, May 1996.
- "Top 10 Litigators in Illinois," The National Law Journal, November 1999.
- "Top Ten Leading Commercial Litigators in Illinois," Leading Lawyers Network, January 2009, July 2010.
- "Top Ten Leading Business Lawyers in Illinois," Leading Lawyers Network, January 2009, July 2010."
- "500 Leading Lawyers in America," Lawdragon, 2010 and 2011.
- "Top 20 Tort Defense Lawyers," Chicago Lawyer, January 2003.
- Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory "AV" (highest) rating.
- International Who's Who of Product Liability Defense Lawyers, 2002-2010.
- International Who's Who of Business Lawyers, 2009-2011.
- Illinois Super Lawyers, "The Top 100," 2011.
- Illinois Super Lawyers, Business Litigation, 2010.
- Who's Who in the World, 2006-2011.
- Who's Who in American Law, 1994-1995, 2005-2010.
- Who's Who in America, 1996-2011.
- Who's Who in the Midwest, 1986-1987, 1992-2011.
- Profile: "Montgomery for the Defense," Chicago Magazine, July 1984.
- Profile: "Defense Attorney: Think Like a Winner to Be a Winner," Chicago Lawyer, January 2003.
- Profile: "Barry Montgomery: Defense Attorney Knows How to Talk to Joe the Juror," Leading Lawyers Network Magazine/Business Edition, January 2009.
Related News
-
Fifteen Partners Named to Leading Lawyers Network
-
Six Partners Named Illinois Super Lawyers for 2012; Two Attorneys Named "Rising Stars"
-
C. Barry Montgomery and Edward R. Moor Receive 2011 Trial Lawyer Excellence Awards
-
Williams Montgomery & John Ltd. Secures an $85,000,000 Settlement in a False Claims Act Case
March 11, 2011 -
Seven Partners Named Illinois Super Lawyers for 2011; One Associate Named a "Rising Star"
February 2011 -
C. Barry Montgomery and Peter C. John Listed in Best Lawyers in America: Annual Guide to Bet-the-Company Litigation
July 7th, 2010 -
C. Barry Montgomery Wins 2010 Trial Lawyer Excellence Award
-
C. Barry Montgomery and Peter C. John Selected for Inclusion in the 2010 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America
-
C. Barry Montgomery Recognized as One of the Top Ten Business Litigators and One of the Top Ten Business Lawyers in the State
-
Lloyd E. Williams, Jr. and C. Barry Montgomery Named Two of the 500 Leading Lawyers in America
-
C. Barry Montgomery Gives Presentation On Client Development to National Defense Audience
-
C. Barry Montgomery and Peter C. John Contribute Chapters to Book on Cross-Examination
Past Speaking Engagements
-
Expert Analyses of Videotaped Product Liability Case
June 7, 2011 -
Evaluating Your Case for Settlement
July 22, 2010 -
Trial Superstars: Trends in Personal Injury Litigation/Wrongful Death
October 29, 2009 -
Preventing Runaway Verdicts in Medical Negligence Cases
October 21, 2009 -
Trends in Personal Injury Wrongful Death Litigation
October 16, 2009 -
Winning the Verdict & Protecting the Record
May 20, 2009 -
Masters in Marketing
October 24, 2008 -
Chicago Daily Law Bulletin's Litigation Skills Conference
March 13, 2008 -
Shaken Not Stirred
February 13, 2008 -
Case Valuation Seminar
October 24, 2007 -
Case Valuation: When to Take the Case - When to Settle
April 12, 2007 -
Appropriate Use and Purpose of Motions in Limine
September 15, 2006 -
"Jury Instructions" and "Third Defense Attorney's Closing Argument"
October 9, 2005 -
Tort Reform Summit
May 29, 2005 -
Measuring Non-Economic Damages
January 13, 2005 -
A Primer for the Entertainment Community: Legal and Practical Issues About Venue Safety - What You Should Know
October 4, 2003 -
The Most Difficult Argument: Putting a Number or Value on the Non-Economic Loss
March 14, 2003 -
Damages
May 12, 2001 -
Defendant's Closing Statement: Bring the Jurors Back to Earth
December 3, 2000 -
Effective Direct and Cross-Examination
August 14, 1999 -
Presenting the Expert Case
May 23, 1999 -
Admissibility of Demonstrative Evidence
December 13, 1998 -
How to Defend Effectively a Punitive Damages Claim
November 2, 1998 -
Effective Direct and Cross-Examination
August 12, 1998 -
Defense of Difficult Damage Issues
May 3, 1998 -
Defending Damage Issues in Wrongful Death Cases
March 19, 1998 -
Effective Direct and Cross-Examination
September 14, 1997 -
Computer Animation in the Courtroom
September 24, 1996 -
Effective Direct and Cross-Examination
August 24, 1996 -
Effective Direct and Cross-Examination
May 18, 1996 -
Defending the Punitive Damage Case
April 13, 1996 -
Montgomery on Cross Examination
March 29, 1996 -
Insulating the Corporation from Punitive Damages
March 14, 1996 -
Hold On to Your Cap - A Lok at How Damage Caps Will Affect the Defense Practice
September 29, 1995 -
Effective Direct and Cross-Examination
August 23, 1995 -
Using the Experts - Issues in the 90s
April 18, 1995 -
Defendant's Closing Argument
October 18, 1994 -
The ABC's of Claims Management
April 12, 1994 -
The Runaway Verdict - Identifying Its Causes and Preventing Its Occurrence
March 11, 1994 -
Famous Chicago Trials Program
January 22, 1994 -
The Masters in Trial - Trial Demonstration
March 24, 1993 -
What Should a Properly Investigated Claims File Contain?
October 14, 1992 -
Defense of Closed Head Injury Claims
October 12, 1992 -
Jury Selection: Defendant's Perspective
October 8, 1992 -
Trial: Handling the High Profile, High Exposure Case
June 23, 1992 -
The Use of Protective Orders and Confidentiality: The Defense Perspective
June 14, 1992 -
How to Address Damages in the Opening Statement and Closing Argument - The Defendant's Perspective
April 22, 1992 -
Opening Statement and Closing Arguments in Products Liability Cases
April 13, 1992 -
The Annuitist on Trial and The Final Argument on Damages
February 5, 1992 -
The Deposition
October 29, 1991 -
The Use of the Annuitist at Trial
October 16, 1991 -
Damage Control
June 23, 1991 -
Panel Discussion on Structured Settlements
June 14, 1991 -
The Use of the Annuitist at Trial, The Cross-Examination of the Plaintiff's Economist and Closing Arguments
May 22, 1991 -
The Use of the Annuitist at Trial
February 25, 1991 -
The Use of the Annuitist at Trial
January 24, 1991 -
Defense Strategies in Catastrophic Cases
September 25, 1990 -
Punitive Damages: Avoiding the Big Hit
July 18, 1990 -
How to Cross-Examine the Plaintiff's Economist
June 23, 1990 -
Trial Demonstration
May 18, 1990 -
The Cross-Examination of the Plaintiff's Economist and Closing Arguments
April 12, 1990 -
Winning Strategies in Litigation
April 9, 1990 -
How to Conduct the Direct and Cross Examination
April 5, 1990 -
The Handlinng of Damages in Catastrophic Cases
December 14, 1989 -
The Handlinng of Damages in Catastrophic Cases
December 10, 1989 -
How to Defend the Issue of Damages Without Impairing the Defense of Liability
November 20, 1989 -
Use of an Annuitist at Trial
October 8, 1989 -
The Annuitist - A Key Witness for the Damages Defense
October 4, 1989 -
Startegies for Opening Statements
October 1, 1989 -
The Millionaire - The Annuitist on Trial
September 5, 1989 -
Defending Damages
August 22, 1989 -
Does the Present Liability System Offer Equal Justice for All
July 15, 1989 -
How to Prove Loss of Future Earnings, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Future Economic Loss - Defendant's Perspective
June 18, 1989 -
Annuity Testimony - What Every Structured Settlement Professional Should Know
May 22, 1989 -
Handling Damages in the Catastrophic Injury Case
April 18, 1989 -
Proving Proximate Cause in Medical Negilgence Cases - Defendant's Perspective
January 22, 1989 -
Preserving and Avoiding Error
November 29, 1988 -
Direct Examination of Defendant
October 18, 1988 -
Defense Evidence on Damages
October 8, 1988 -
The Damages Defense in the Catastrophic Injury Case
September 28, 1988 -
Trying the Catastrophic Injury Case
August 22, 1988 -
How the Defense Can Effectively Introduce and Use an Annuitist to Offset the Plaintiff's Economist
July 18, 1988 -
Plaintiff's Economist
July 17, 1988 -
Negotiating Structures
April 18, 1988 -
Opening Statements
February 14, 1988 -
Framing the Issue: How to Approach Damage Questions in the Opening Statement and in the Closing Argument
February 5, 1988 -
Defense Strategy in Trying Catastrophic Injury Cases
November 19, 1987 -
Mock-Up of Consultation on a Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Case and Mock-Up of Consultation on a Closed Head Injury Case
November 8, 1987 -
Making Your Closing Arguments More Compelling
October 29, 1987 -
Controlling Damages
June 22, 1987 -
Controlilng Damages: The Defense Strategy
May 22, 1987 -
Demonstration of Products Liability Discovery Deposition - Use of Expert Witnesses - Use of Evidence
May 12, 1987 -
Controlling Damages: The High-Stakes Case
March 14, 1987 -
The Millionaire - The Defense Economist: Yes or No and the Alternatives
February 19, 1987 -
Containment of Damages
January 22, 1987 -
Fair and Reasonable Compensation
September 22, 1986 -
Courtroom Strategies, Psychology of Cross Examination and Psychology of Closing Argument
May 22, 1986 -
Mitigation & Damages in High Value Litigation
November 3, 1985 -
The Art of Minimizing Damages
November 30, 1999 -
Demonstrations of Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Economist and Use of an Annuitist to Offset Plaintiff's Economist
November 30, 1999
Publications
-
Putting a Number or Value on the Non-Economic Loss
-
How to Defend Punitive Damages Claims Effectively -- and Maybe Successfully
-
Link Trial Presentation to Jury Instructions
-
Beyond the Threshold (Part I)
-
Beyond the Threshold (Part II)
-
Some Thoughts on Jury Selection
-
Crafting A Successful Closing Argument
-
Preventing the Runaway Verdict in Catastrophic Injury Cases
-
The Four Cardinal Rules of Business Generation
-
The Four Cardinal Rules of Business Generation
-
The Keys to Successful Business Development
-
The Art of Settlement - Factors to Consider
-
Chapter on "Cross Examination of the Catastrophically Injured Plaintiff"
-
When to Settle a Case - Factors to Consider
-
Pick a Winner: Some Thoughts on Jury Selection
-
Advanced Defense Trial Strategies for Prevailing in a Complex Brain and Spinal Cord Case
-
The Most Difficult Argument: Putting a Number or Value on the Non-Economic Loss
-
A Primer for the Entertainment Community: Legal and Practical Issues About Venue Safety - What You Should Know
-
Defending the Dead-Bang Loser
-
Chapter on "Direct Examination of Annuitists"
-
Chapter on "Applying the Admissibility Standards to the Economist"
-
Federal Preemption: Still a Cure for Managed Care Liability Claims?
-
Chapter on "Direct Examination of Lay Witnesses at Trial"
-
International Association of Defense Counsel Training Manual
-
Using Annuity Cost Evidence to Contain Awards for Future Damages
-
Using Annuity Cost Evidence on Issues of Future Damages
-
The Annuitist - A Key Defense Witness on the Issue of Damages
-
Chapter on "Keeping Damages Fair and Reasonable"
-
Chapter on "Defendant's Opening Statement"
Representative Matters
-
Ailey v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill.
Won medical malpractice suit for defendant hospital. Plaintiff alleged brain injury to newborn during forceps delivery. (Selected by The National Law Journal as one of the "Outstanding Defense Verdicts" in the United States). -
Bausch & Lomb, Inc./Renu with Moistureloc Product Liability Litigation
Various state and federal courts in Illinois
Represented Bausch & Lomb, Inc. and Walgreen Co. in dozens of product liability lawsuits involving Bausch & Lomb Renu with Moistureloc contact lens solution. Cases settled. -
Cartwright v. Goodyear Tire Company
Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill.
Settled product liability tire separation case brought against client Goodyear. Case previously tried by different defense counsel, resulting in $12 million verdict that was overturned on appeal. -
Central Illinois Light Co. v. Freeman United Coal Co.
Arbitration, Chicago, Ill.
Won breach of contract suit on behalf of Central Illinois Light Co. Plaintiff sought damages and termination in connection with a long-term coal supply agreement. -
Estate of Cody Quimby, minor v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
U.S. District Court, District of Arizona
Won product liability lawsuit brought against client Sears alleging defective design of above-ground pool manufactured and sold by Sears. Plaintiff, age 15, became a quadriplegic after diving into the pool. -
General Electric Welding Rod Litigation
State courts in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and Wisconsin
Obtained dismissal for client General Electric of individual and class action lawsuits throughout the United States involving product liability and conspiracy claims based on alleged defective welding products. -
James M. McKevitt, et al. v. The Chicago Athletic Association, et al.
U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division
Settled class action lawsuit on behalf of plaintiffs against officers of Chicago Athletic Association for breach of fiduciary duty. -
Lister v. Bill Kelley Athletic, Inc.
Circuit Court of DuPage County, Ill.
Won product liability lawsuit brought against client Kelley Athletic, Inc. (formerly McGregor Sports), manufacturer of football helmets, alleging defective design and failure to warn. Plaintiff became a quadriplegic when making a tackle during a high school football game. -
Montgomery, et al. v. Aetna Plywood, et al.
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Won class action on behalf of defendant ESOP trustee. Beneficiaries of ESOP Trust brought lawsuit against corporation and its ESOP trustees for breach of fiduciary duties and ERISA violations. -
Polsky v. Indeck Energy Service, Inc.
Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill. (1994)
Obtained reversal of $17 million of a $24 million arbitration award against client Indeck Energy in breach of employment and stock agreements lawsuit brought by Polsky. -
Prudential Plaza Associates v. Turner Construction Company
Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill.
Won $9 million breach of contract and promissory fraud counterclaim for defendant Turner Construction. Plaintiff originally sought $37 million in delay and remedial damages arising out of the construction of Two Prudential Plaza. (Selected by The National Law Journal as one of the "Outstanding Defense Verdicts" in the United States). -
Rachel Barton v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Authority (METRA) and Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill.
Represented defendants Metra and Union Pacific in the most highly publicized civil trial in Cook County, Ill., history. Rachel Barton, a 20-year-old celebrity violinist, became caught in door and dragged by commuter train resulting in amputation of her legs. Case decided for plaintiff. -
Sean Mason ex. rel. United States v. Medline, Inc. and the Medline Foundation
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Secured $85 million recovery on behalf of the U.S. government representing qui tam plaintiff after the United States declined to intervene. Lawsuit brought against Medline for its national practice of securing contracts by providing kickbacks to medical care facilities using complex methods that made it impossible for providers to accurately report savings to the government in accordance with applicable regulations. Case settled after discovery for $85 million plus attorney's fees. -
Sears Roebuck and Co. v. Duke-Weeks Realty Limited Partnership, et al.
Circuit Court of Will County, Ill.
Settled multimillion-dollar lawsuit brought against client Duke-Weeks Realty involving a commercial warehouse owned by the client. Plaintiff tenant alleged roof collapse was caused by faulty construction, design and failure to maintain. -
Smith as Bankruptcy Plan Trustee for Estate of Boston Chicken, Inc. v. Arthur Anderson, et al.
U.S. District Court, District Court of Arizona
Represented individual director and member of audit committee of Boston Chicken, Inc. in suit against breach of fiduciary duty claims arising out of the Boston Chicken bankruptcy. Settled after extensive discovery and while summary judgment motions were pending. -
Smith v. Black & Decker
Circuit Court of Will County, Ill.
Won product liability lawsuit brought against client Black & Decker seeking $12 million compensatory and punitive damages. Case arose out of alleged defective design of Black & Decker power saw. (Selected by The National Law Journal as one of the "Outstanding Defense Verdicts" in the United States). -
United States of America v. International Paper Company, et al.
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas
Won criminal antitrust case on behalf of Weyerhaeuser employee alleging national conspiracy to fix prices in the corrugated box industry in violation of the Sherman Act. At the time, was the largest criminal antitrust suit brought by the U.S. government against a single industry. -
Vancom v. Zurich American Insurance Company
U.S. District Court, District of Nevada
Settled lawsuit on behalf of defendant Zurich in suit brought by insured claiming insurance bad faith and breach of contract. Case arose out of a $26 million excess verdict against Zurich's insured. -
Whirlpool Corporation v. Sensata Technologies, Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc.
Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill.
Currently represent client Whirlpool in product liability lawsuit brought against Texas Instruments to recover damages caused by recall of 1.8 million refrigerators. Texas Instruments is the manufacturer of the component part that allegedly caused the recall. Case pending. -
Yoder v. Roundy's Inc.
Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill.
Defended Roundy's, Inc. in lawsuit seeking $110 million in damages for multiple catastrophic injuries and a death resulting from a 15-car pile-up on Interstate 90 in Chicago. Verdict of $10.3 million against Roundy's was one-half of the lowest pretrial demand.
