Willis Tower 233 S. Wacker, Suite 6100 Chicago, Illinois 60606-6359
Phone: 312.443.3200 | Fax: 312.630.8500 | E-mail: wmjinfo@willmont.com
Michael C. Bruck - Partner
Biography
Michael C. Bruck is a partner of Williams Montgomery & John Ltd., a former member of the firm's Executive Committee, current co-chair of the insurance practice group, and a member of the professional liability and commercial litigation groups. He focuses his practice on complex commercial disputes, professional and financial malpractice, and insurance litigation. Mr. Bruck is "AV Preeminent" peer review rated by Martindale-Hubbell, reflecting the highest peer recognition for ethical standards and legal ability.
Mr. Bruck has been selected by his peers for inclusion in Illinois Leading Lawyers for commercial litigation, professional malpractice defense law, and insurance coverage and reinsurance law. He also has been selected for inclusion in Illinois Super Lawyers for professional liability, insurance coverage and business litigation.
Mr. Bruck has more than 20 years of jury trial, litigation and client advisory experience, handling hundreds of high-stakes cases in state and federal courts throughout the United States. He has represented numerous clients in a range of industries, including Toyota Motor Sales, USA, major law firms, and Kemper Insurance Companies.
Mr. Bruck has extensive professional liability experience, successfully resolving hundreds of lawsuits involving claims of legal malpractice, accountant's malpractice, agent's and broker's errors and omissions, and a variety of other financial malpractice claims.
In the commercial litigation area, Mr. Bruck was a lead trial and appellate counsel in an automobile franchise act lawsuit against a major auto manufacturer that went to trial, was appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court and has had a major impact on Illinois statutory law. Mr. Bruck also has litigated and tried business and intellectual property disputes involving trade libel, copyright infringement and trademark infringement claims.
In addition, Mr. Bruck is an established advisor and litigator in the insurance area. Early in his career, Mr. Bruck was a defense steering committee member in one of the first environmental coverage lawsuits involving manufactured gas plants. Over the past 20 years, Mr. Bruck has represented insurers and policyholders in a variety of coverage disputes, including those involving directors and officers, professional liability, general liability and numerous specialty coverages. He also has acted as national counsel for Kemper Insurance Companies, advising on, litigating and resolving high-stakes cases nationwide.
Education/Bar Admissions
Mr. Bruck received a B.S. in organizational leadership and supervision in 1984 from Purdue University. He received his J.D. in 1988 from DePaul College of Law. He has served as a CPCU instructor at Insurance School of Chicago.
Mr. Bruck was admitted to the Illinois bar in 1988 and also has been admitted in the following federal trial and appellate courts:
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois (including the trial bar)
- U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois
- U.S. District Court, District of Maine
- U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
In addition, Mr. Bruck has been admitted pro hac vice in state and federal courts throughout the country.
Professional Activities
Mr. Bruck is active in numerous professional and civic organizations, including:
- Chicago Bar Association: chair, Committee on Attorney Malpractice, 2007-2008; vice-chair, Committee on Attorney Malpractice 2006-2007; investigator and hearing officer, Judicial Evaluation Committee
- Illinois State Bar Association
- American Bar Association, Professional Liability Committee
- Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
- Appellate Lawyers Association
- Defense Research Institute: member, Steering Committee, Professional Liability Committee, 2004-present; chair, Agents & Brokers Sub-Committee; chair, Third Party Audit Subcommittee, chair, Civility Subcommittee, Committee on Professionalism and Ethics, 1998-2001
- Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel (IDC): technology law columnist, IDC Quarterly, 2004-present; co-chair, Commercial Litigation Committee, 2008-present
- Professional Liability Underwriting Society
- Seventh Circuit Bar Association
- Society of Trial Lawyers
- DePaul University College of Law, Alumni Board of Directors
- Chicago Legal Clinic for the Disabled, volunteer
Related News
Past Speaking Engagements
-
Worker's Compensation
March 1, 2012 -
Why Don't You Stop the Bleeding?
December 15, 2011 -
Chicago Bar Association Workmen's Compensation Committee Meeting
December 1, 2011 -
Chicago Bar Association Professional Responsibility Committee Meeting
November 18, 2011 -
Insurance Law for Illinois Attorneys
November 10, 2011 -
Professional Liability for Spoliation of Evidence
October 8, 2009 -
Evidentiary Issues Commonly Faced at Trial
February 27, 2009 -
Construction Defect Coverage Issues
June 27, 2008 -
Principles of Advertising Injury Coverage
June 27, 2008 -
Perspectives on Legal Malpractice
June 12, 2008 -
Basic Skills Program
October 25, 2007 -
Ethical Considerations for Collection, Retention and Preservation of Evidence
May 5, 2007 -
Evidence Update
September 17, 2005 -
Avoiding Malpractice for Tax Services
August 15, 2004 -
On the Record with Greta Van Susteren
May 12, 2002 -
Hannity & Colmes
May 12, 2002 -
Managing Your Accounting Firm in the Year 2000 and Beyond
September 17, 1999 -
Proving Damages in a Commercial Case
October 4, 1996 -
The Do's and Don't's of Corporate Documentation
September 13, 1996
Publications
-
eBay, Inc. et al. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., Three Years Later: Patent Trolls Remain Alive and Active Under the 'Bridge' of Patent Infringement Prosecution
-
Chapter on Reservation of Rights Letters
-
Patent Exhaustion - The Limits to Post-Sale Restrictions Following Quanta
-
Seagate May Bring Sea of Change to Patent Cases
-
Supreme Court Puts the Brakes on Patent Infringement: The Relaxed Obviousness Standard in KSR v. Teleflex
-
Jerry Falwell's Ears Are Burning - Gripe Sites, Domain Names, and Rejecting the Initial Interest Confusion Doctrine
-
Long Live the Tie-In! The Supreme Court's Decision in Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Indepndent Ink Inc.
-
Consumers vs. Patent Holders - Will the Supreme Court Uphold the Market Power Presumption
-
Teaching Old Tricks to a New Dog: The Supreme Court's Application of Common Law Doctrines to New Technology in MGM v. Grokster
-
The Supreme Court Uncorks E-Commerce in Internet Wine Sales Decision
-
"May" is Sounding More Like "Shall" When Awarding Fees in Certain Copyright Cases
-
Betamax Revisited Again
-
A Long-Awaited First Interpretation of Section 1201(a) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
-
Nanotechnology - It's Small, But It May Be the Next Big Thing
-
Understanding and Making the Most of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in Illinois
-
Two Punitive Damages Cases Every Commercial Litigator Should Know About
Representative Matters
-
Artline v. Universal Statuary
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Defended trade libel and prosecuted copyright infringement claims between manufacturers of naturalistic animal statuary in two-week jury trial. Case resolved through confidential settlement. -
Belleville Toyota v. Toyota Motor Sales, et al.
316 Ill. App. 3d 227 (5th Dist. 2000), reversed in part, 199 Ill.2d 325 (2002)
Handled case of first impression involving claims of Illinois Motor Vehicle Franchise Act violation and breach of contract claims. Appellate court found that UCC statute of limitations applies to franchise agreements and that statute of limitations is not tolled by continuing breaches of contract or continuing violations of Franchise Act. -
Belleville Toyota v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.
Circuit Court of St. Clair County, Ill.
Defended auto manufacturer and distributor in three-week jury trial of franchise act and breach of contract lawsuit brought by dealer arising from dispute over allocation of vehicles. -
Bohar v. Eich & Thompson, Inc.
California Superior Court
Achieved dismissal of legal malpractice and fraud lawsuit brought by disgruntled oil and gas investors who lost significant amounts of money in speculative investments. -
Cho v. Environmental Management Group
Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill.
Obtained dismissal of $3 million lost profits claim against environmental auditor client arising from a Phase I environmental site assessment on property containing asbestos. Claims dismissed during two-week jury trial. -
CNA v. Meckler
Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill.
Represented defendant in claim for legal malpractice in the defense of plaintiff's insureds. Defendant counterclaimed for $1.5 million in fees owed by plaintiff. Case resolved in mediation. -
Fuller v. Decatur School Dist. No. 61, et al.
78 F. Supp. 2d 812 (C.D. Ill 2000) affirmed, 251 F.3d 662 (7th Cir. 2001)
Tried and argued appeal of civil rights case involving issues of zero tolerance school disciplinary policy and racial discrimination. -
Fuller v. Decatur School District No. 61, et al.
U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois
Achieved "not guilty" verdict for school board in civil rights lawsuit brought by six students expelled for a gang fight at a football game. Claims were prosecuted by Operation PUSH and Rev. Jesse Jackson and garnered national attention due to board's so-called zero tolerance policy. Decision reported at 78 F.Supp.2d 812 (C.D. Ill. 2000), affirmed, 251 F.3d 662 (7th Cir. 2001). -
Kristan v. O'Brien
Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill.
Won malpractice lawsuit representing defendant's attorney against allegations of failure to prosecute case. -
Liberty Mutual v. Ross & Hardies
(Ill. App. 1st Dist. 2001)
Handled case of first impression in Illinois involving claims of attorney malpractice. Appellate court found insurer had no right of subrogation against its insured's defense counsel. -
Midwest Imports v. Coval
71 F.3d 1311 (7th Cir. 1995)
Successfully argued appeal of accountant's malpractice case. Seventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment for auditor client finding no breach of duty of care. -
Mitchell Bros. v. Warady & Davis
Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill.
Favorably resolved lawsuit against accounting firm and its partners alleging failure to detect and report defalcation. Plaintiff declined pretrial offer of $275,000 and asked jury for more than $800,000 in damages. After a two-week trial, jury returned verdict of $133,000. -
Northern Illinois Emergency Physicians v. Sands, et al.
216 Ill.2d 294 (2005)
Argued appeal of seminal attorney malpractice case on damages in which Illinois Supreme Court ruled that indemnity judgment did not constitute proximate cause damages. -
Wolf & Company v. Cevin
(Ill. App. 2nd Dist. 1997)
Obtained appellate decision for auditor client in accountant's malpractice case in which the plaintiff sought $21 million in damages. Appellate court affirmed summary judgment for auditor, finding that parent corporation had no standing to assert claims for failed subsidiaries.
